Information and Communications Technology and Supermarket Chains - Part 2
The assertions I made in my previous post on the role of ICT
in the supermarket supply chain management include: stock management, supply
chain management and distributed systems management across Australia. Communications within the retailer’s
franchise and with customers and suppliers, from Point of Sale to Automation,
Warehousing and to higher levels of organisational management and reporting.
One article I have referenced is “Analysing trust as a means
of improving the effectiveness of the virtual supply chain”1 which
treats the organisation of the supply chain from the supplier through to the
retailer as a Virtual Organisation. “. Traditional relationships between
retailer, manufacturer, distributor and farmer have begun to change, with moves
towards partnerships and alliances that have a greater emphasis on supply chain
management”2 (Thompson, 2001).
One of the primary problems that faces the Virtual
Organisation is the lack of daily face-to-face contact instead relying on
electronic means such as “mobile phones, e-mail, the internet, fax machines and
other electronic devices, acts as a communication and coordination mechanism
among partners”1 (Paterson and Maguire et al., 2008, pp. 325-348).
“The Australian horticulture industry supply chain is moving
towards more electronic identification of pallets, cartons, trays, and
individual pieces of fruit and vegetables. Woolworths’ supermarkets required
all their supply chain partners in the fruit and vegetable sector in 2005 to
place GS1 barcodes on all pallets”1
The GS1 barcoding allows communication of shipping weights, product information and scanning to process from Supplier to Customer throughout the retail chain – it’s in international standard for communicating what goods are being shipped in specific quantities.
Regarding the distribution of management of an organisation
of this magnitude, (Matopoulos and Vlachopoulou et al., 2007, pp. 177-186)
mention:
“Concerning industry's macro-factors, globalization extends
the business scope and activities of a company, to other regions. At the same
time, the government of activities that are now dispersed in a greater
geographical range becomes more difficult, increasing the need for collaboration
… Collaboration in the form of increased information exchanges is needed in
order to achieve transparency across the supply chain.”3
Warehousing, especially with regards to distribution centres have are migrating to automated pickers and other systems to improve efficiencies and reliability of information and supply chain management. “An effective traceability system brings many benefits, such as increasing the security and confidence of customers, and limiting withdrawal of commodities”4 (Ino and Montrucchio et al., 2009, pp. 2357-2365).
“An effective traceability system is fundamental for avoiding a large waste of resources. Automation is regarded as the key to realize an effective internal traceability system.”4
As shown by the references, the warehousing, supply chain management and organisational management in Supermarket retail is highly driven by ICT currently, and looking forward to the future.
References:
1.
Paterson, I., Maguire, H. and Al-Hakim, L. (2008)
Analysing trust as a means of improving the effectiveness of the virtual supply
chain. International Journal of
Networking and Virtual Organisations, 5 (3), pp.
325-348.
2.
Thompson, G. (2001) Supply Chain Management:
Building Partnerships and Alliances in International Food and Agribusiness,
Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, Canberra.
3.
Matopoulos,
A., Vlachopoulou, M., Manthou, V. and Manos, B. (2007) A conceptual framework
for supply chain collaboration: empirical evidence from the agri-food industry. Supply Chain Management: an international journal, 12 (3), pp. 177-186.
4.
G,
Ino, F., Montrucchio, B., Rebaudengo, M. and Sanchez, E. R. (2009) On improving
automation by integrating RFID in the traceability management of the agri-food
sector. Industrial Electronics, IEEE
Transactions on, 56 (7), pp. 2357-2365.